|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Regression
Regression is one of the statistical tools usedin the Multi-Vari approach and isprobably the most powerful.It determines
There are two basic forms of Regression:
It is the statistical analysistechnique used to investigate and model the relationship betweenthe variables. For both the Simple and Multiple techniques, themodel parameters are linear in nature, not quadratic or any otherpower. Given the sheer size of the subject and the application ofthe tool in Lean Sigma, here the focus is primarily on SimpleLinear Regression.
As with all statistical tests, a sample ofreality is required. Generally 30 or more data points are requiredfor the X and the corresponding value of Y at that point.Regression is a passive analysis tool and so the process is notactively manipulated during the data capture. After the requisitenumber of data points have been collected, they are entered as twocolumns into a statistical software package and analyzed. Analyzing the data graphically using a FittedLine Plot shows a result similar to the example shown below. Here the X is "AgeOf Propellant" in a rocket motor and the Y is "Shear Strength" ofthe propellant at that age. The data points are plotted on aScatter Plot and then a straight line is fitted through them togive the best statistical fit. This is the Regression Line. Thereare many ways of doing this mathematically; in Regression theapproach is to use Least Squares, which minimizes the total squaresof all the distances from the line. Example Fitted LinePlot
The equation of the straight line (theRegression model) is given above the graph and is
Thus, in the future, for any Age of Propellantfrom 0 to 25 weeks,it is possible to predict thephysical property Shear Strength for that propellant. Also, if theShear Strength had to be maintained above a certain level toperform correctly, then it is also possible to calculate a would-beshelf life for the propellant based on the model. Thereis no data outside of this timeframe and so no predictions shouldbe made beyond 25 weeks. In the top right of Figure are three statistics. These are infact only three of many which are available from the full analysisresults, which are shown in Figure below The analysis shows the sameequation (model) representing the relationship between Y and X. Analysis results for theRocket Propellant example.
Source: SBTI's Lean Sigma Methodology training material. For the constant term and for each X in themodel there is a p-value indicating whether that term issignificantly non-zero. Both have a p-value of zero, whichindicates thatthere would be a small (almost zero) chance of getting coefficientsthis large (far from zero) purely by random chance.Specifically
The bottom table is an ANOVA (Analysis OfVariance) table. TheANOVA table breaks the variation into two main pieces:
The calculation of these is shown graphically inFigure below
Graphical representationof ANOVA calculation.
From the preceding calculations it is possibleto calculate a signal-to-noise ratio based on the size of theRegression (the signal) versus the background noise (ResidualError). This is the F-test in the table. Here the value of F is165.38, which means the size of the signal due to the X is 165.38times greater than the background noise. The software then looks up the F value in astatistical table to discover the likelihood of seeing a differenceof this magnitude. The likelihood is the p-value, in thiscase 0.000. The p-value indicates thelikelihood of seeing a relationship this strong in the data samplepurely by random chance; this means that there is no relationshipat the population level, it happened by coincidence in selectingthe sample from the population. As in most statistical tests, ifthe p-value is associated with a pair of hypotheses, forRegression:
If the p-value is less than 0.05 (as in thisexample) then the null hypothesis Hoshould be rejectedand the conclusion is that the Y is dependent on the X. Beltssometimes are misled at this point into assuming that there is adirect causal relationship between the X and the Y. There might be,but a change in X does not necessarily directly cause Y to move. The statistically correctexplanation here is that when X moves 1 unit, Y moves by someconsistent associated amount. The analysis is not complete until the modeladequacy is validated, which is done by reviewing the quality ofthe fit and an investigation into the variation that has not beenexplained, the Residuals (the bit left over). Residual evaluationgives a warning sign that the generated model might not be adequateor appropriate. Looking at Figure above, you know the residual is theactual value minus the fitted value, and it can be negative orpositive depending on whether the data point is above or below theline. There are several measures of model adequacy with respect tothe Residuals:
To validate model adequacy it is useful toexamine the residuals graphically. To determine if the Residualsare Normal a few options are available:
To determine if the Residuals are in Control, anIndividuals Chart can be applied to the Residuals as shown in GraphC. Residuals that appear out of control should be studied further.Possible out-of-control issues might include Measurement Systemserror, incorrect data entry, or an unusual process event. In thecase of the latter, the Team should consult any notes taken duringthe data collection to evaluate the impact of the processevent. To determine if the Residuals have constantvariance and to show that they are random (just background noise),a Residuals versus Fits Plot can be applied, as shown in Graph D.The Residuals should be distributed randomly across the Plot; anyobvious patterns could indicate model inadequacy as described inbelow Interpretation of theResiduals versus Fits Plot
If there are patterns in the Residuals and theR2 value is very high, it probably presents no problem;however, if, for example, R2 is less than 80% then theremight be opportunity to create a better model based on the pathsrecommended in the table. After the model is deemed to be adequate, theTeam should collectively draw practical conclusions from it andpresent them back to the Process Owner and the Champion. RoadmapTheroadmap to conducting a Regression analysis is as follows:
Interpreting theOutputRegression in its Simple Linear form is quitestraightforward to apply. There are, however, as with all tools,several pitfalls that can cause Belts problems:
Incorrect causalrelationships.
Source SBTI's Lean Sigma Methodology training material.
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Add Our RSS Feed
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||